/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) semantic representation (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: semantic representation
Is in goldstandard
1
paper UY_ALFALtxt136 - : Osswald, Rainer y Anja Latrouite. 2009. Semantic representation and complement realization: The case of remember revisited, Comunicación presentada en la 10 ^th Role and Reference Grammar International Conference, Berkeley, agosto 2009 . [ [116]Links ]
2
paper corpusSignostxt217 - : The one-student-one-tutor is coupled to one-tutor-more-students, whereas one-room-one-bath is coupled with one-bath-one-room. Only interpretation could prevent the integration of incorrect propositions. The different meanings cannot be pointed out in a simple propositional representation. Again, a formal semantic representation in underlying events does offer a solution for the multiple quantifer problem:
3
paper corpusSignostxt500 - : In the last step in the parsing process, the CLS has to be automatically transduced into “a purely semantic conceptual representation in COREL” (^[61]Fumero & Díaz, 2017: 37). COREL (Conceptual Representation Language) is the machine-readable metalanguage that is used in the conceptual semantic representation of CLSs “that serves as the input for the reasoning engine” (^[62]Van Valin & Mairal 2014: 217), as shown below in the COREL scheme for the L1-locative construction that appears in the Grammaticon module in FunGramKB:
Evaluando al candidato semantic representation:
1) conceptual: 3
2) corel: 3 (*)
semantic representation
Lengua:
Frec: 38
Docs: 15
Nombre propio: 1 / 38 = 2%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.606 = (1 + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+5.28540221886225)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| semantic representation |
: 16.Papafragou, Anna. 1998 a. The acquisition of modality. Implication for a theory of semantic representation. Mind and Language 13. 370-399. : Bickel, B. (1997). Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua, 102, 115-131. : Jackendoff, R. (1976). Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7, (pp. 89-150). : Shanon, B. (1988). Semantic representation of meaning: A critique. Psychological bulletin, 104(1), 70-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.70 : The use of ψ-propositions has become subject of criticism (Moore, 1995). This criticism does not really concern the use of a semantic representation as such, but the actual definition of propositions. Four examples will be given why ψ-propositions are rather problematic. : Van Valin, Robert D. y David P. Wilkins. 1993. Predicting syntactic structure from semantic representation: remember in English and its equivalents in Mparntwe Arrernte, en R. Van Valin (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, Amsterdam, John Benjamins : 499-534. : Vigliocco, Gabriella & Vinson, David. (2007). Semantic representation. En M. G. Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 195-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |